Topic
Agents
Discussion about AI agents, workflows, and reliability.
Related papers
RePEc: Research Papers in Economics
Mastering Atari, Go, chess and shogi by planning with a learned model
Abstract Constructing agents with planning capabilities has long been one of the main challenges in the pursuit of artificial intelligence. Tree-based planning methods have enjoyed huge success in challenging domains, such as chess1 and Go2, where a perfect simulator is available. However, in real-world problems, the dynamics governing the environment are often complex and unknown. Here we present the MuZero algorithm, which, by combining a tree-based search with a learned model, achieves superhuman performance in a range of challenging and visually complex domains, without any knowledge of their underlying dynamics. The MuZero algorithm learns an iterable model that produces predictions relevant to planning: the action-selection policy, the value function and the reward. When evaluated on 57 different Atari games3—the canonical video game environment for testing artificial intelligence techniques, in which model-based planning approaches have historically struggled4—the MuZero algorithm achieved state-of-the-art performance. When evaluated on Go, chess and shogi—canonical environments for high-performance planning—the MuZero algorithm matched, without any knowledge of the game dynamics, the superhuman performance of the AlphaZero algorithm5 that was supplied with the rules of the game.
arXiv cs.AI
How memory can affect collective and cooperative behaviors in an LLM-Based Social Particle Swarm
This study examines how model-specific characteristics of Large Language Model (LLM) agents, including internal alignment, shape the effect of memory on their collective and cooperative dynamics in a multi-agent system. To this end, we extend the Social Particle Swarm (SPS) model, in which agents move in a two-dimensional space and play the Prisoner's Dilemma with neighboring agents, by replacing its rule-based agents with LLM agents endowed with Big Five personality scores and varying memory lengths. Using Gemini-2.0-Flash, we find that memory length is a critical parameter governing collective behavior: even a minimal memory drastically suppressed cooperation, transitioning the system from stable cooperative clusters through cyclical formation and collapse of clusters to a state of scattered defection as memory length increased. Big Five personality traits correlated with agent behaviors in partial agreement with findings from experiments with human participants, supporting the validity of the model. Comparative experiments using Gemma~3:4b revealed the opposite trend: longer memory promoted cooperation, accompanied by the formation of dense cooperative clusters. Sentiment analysis of agents' reasoning texts showed that Gemini interprets memory increasingly negatively as its length grows, while Gemma interprets it less negatively, and that this difference persists in the early phase of experiments before the macro-level dynamics converge. These results suggest that model-specific characteristics of LLMs, potentially including alignment, play a fundamental role in determining emergent social behavior in Generative Agent-Based Modeling, and provide a micro-level cognitive account of the contradictions found in prior work on memory and cooperation.
arXiv cs.AI
GCA Framework: A Gulf-Grounded Dataset and Agentic Pipeline for Climate Decision Support
Climate decision-making in the Gulf increasingly demands systems that can translate heterogeneous scientific and policy evidence into actionable guidance, yet general-purpose large language models (LLMs) remain weak both in region-specific climate knowledge and grounded interaction with geospatial and forecasting tools. We present the GCA framework, which unifies (i) GCA-DS, a curated Gulf-focused multimodal dataset, and (ii) Gulf Climate Agent (GCA), a tool-augmented agent for climate analysis. GCA-DS comprises ~200k question-answer pairs spanning governmental policies and adaptation plans, NGO and international frameworks, academic literature, and event-driven reporting on heatwaves, dust storms, and floods, complemented with remote-sensing inputs that couple imagery with textual evidence. Building on this foundation, the GCA agent orchestrates a modular tool pipeline grounded in real-time and historical signals and geospatial processing that produces derived indices and interpretable visualizations. Finally, we benchmark open and proprietary LLMs on Gulf climate tasks and show that domain fine-tuning and tool integration substantially improve reliability over general-purpose baselines.
arXiv cs.AI
Frontier-Eng: Benchmarking Self-Evolving Agents on Real-World Engineering Tasks with Generative Optimization
Current LLM agent benchmarks, which predominantly focus on binary pass/fail tasks such as code generation or search-based question answering, often neglect the value of real-world engineering that is often captured through the iterative optimization of feasible designs. To this end, we introduce Frontier-Eng, a human-verified benchmark for generative optimization -- an iterative propose-execute-evaluate loop in which an agent generates candidate artifacts, receives executable verifier feedback, and revises them under a fixed interaction budget -- spanning $47$ tasks across five broad engineering categories. Unlike previous suites, Frontier-Eng tasks are grounded in industrial-grade simulators and verifiers that provide continuous reward signals and enforce hard feasibility constraints under constrained budgets. We evaluate eight frontier language models using representative search frameworks, finding that while Claude 4.6 Opus achieves the most robust performance, the benchmark remains challenging for all models. Our analysis suggests a dual power-law decay in improvement frequency ($\sim$ 1/iteration) and magnitude ($\sim$ 1/improvement count). We further show that although width improves parallelism and diversity, depth remains crucial for hard-won improvements under a fixed budget. Frontier-Eng establishes a new standard for assessing the capacity of AI agents to integrate domain knowledge with executable feedback to solve complex, open-ended engineering problems.
arXiv cs.AI
Coding-Free and Privacy-Preserving MCP Framework for Clinical Agentic Research Intelligence System
Clinical research involves labor-intensive processes such as study design, cohort construction, model development, and documentation, requiring domain expertise, programming skills, and access to sensitive patient data. These demands create barriers for clinicians and external researchers conducting data-driven studies. To overcome these limitations, we developed a Clinical Agentic Research Intelligence System (CARIS) that automates the clinical research workflow while preserving data privacy, enabling comprehensive studies without direct access to raw data. CARIS integrates Large Language Models (LLMs) with modular tools via the Model Context Protocol (MCP), enabling natural language-driven orchestration of appropriate tools. Databases remain securely within the MCP server, and users access only the outputs and final research reports. Based on user intent, CARIS automatically executes the full pipeline: research planning, literature search, cohort construction, Institutional Review Board (IRB) documentation, Vibe Machine Learning (ML), and report generation, with iterative human-in-the-loop refinement. We evaluated CARIS on three heterogeneous datasets with distinct clinical tasks. Research plans and IRB documents were finalized within three to four iterations, using evidence from literature and data. The system supported Vibe ML by exploring feature-model combinations, ranking the top ten models, and generating performance visualizations. Final reports showed high completeness based on a checklist derived from the TRIPOD+AI framework, achieving 96% coverage in LLM evaluation and 82% in human evaluation. CARIS demonstrates that agentic AI can transform clinical hypotheses into executable research workflows across heterogeneous datasets. By eliminating the need for coding and direct data access, the system lowers barriers and bridges public and private clinical data environments.
arXiv cs.AI
A Scoping Review of Large Language Model-Based Pedagogical Agents
This scoping review examines the emerging field of Large Language Model (LLM)-based pedagogical agents in educational settings. While traditional pedagogical agents have been extensively studied, the integration of LLMs represents a transformative advancement with unprecedented capabilities in natural language understanding, reasoning, and adaptation. Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we analyzed 52 studies across five major databases from November 2022 to January 2025. Our findings reveal diverse LLM-based agents spanning K-12, higher education, and informal learning contexts across multiple subject domains. We identified four key design dimensions characterizing these agents: interaction approach (reactive vs. proactive), domain scope (domain-specific vs. general-purpose), role complexity (single-role vs. multi-role), and system integration (standalone vs. integrated). Emerging trends include multi-agent systems that simulate naturalistic learning environments, virtual student simulation for agent evaluation, integration with immersive technologies, and combinations with learning analytics. We also discuss significant research gaps and ethical considerations regarding privacy, accuracy, and student autonomy. This review provides researchers and practitioners with a comprehensive understanding of LLM-based pedagogical agents while identifying crucial areas for future development in this rapidly evolving field.
arXiv cs.AI
CascadeDebate: Multi-Agent Deliberation for Cost-Aware LLM Cascades
Cascaded LLM systems coordinate models of varying sizes with human experts to balance accuracy, cost, and abstention under uncertainty. However, single-model tiers at each stage often struggle with ambiguous queries, triggering premature escalations to costlier models or experts due to under-confidence and inefficient compute scaling. CascadeDebate addresses this gap by inserting multi-agent deliberation directly at each tier's escalation boundary. Confidence-based routers activate lightweight agent ensembles only for uncertain cases, enabling consensus-driven resolution of ambiguities internally without invoking higher-cost upgrades. Our unified architecture alternates single-model inference with selective multi-agent deliberation across model scales, culminating in human experts as the final fallback. This design scales test-time compute dynamically according to query difficulty. Across five benchmarks spanning science, medicine, and general knowledge, CascadeDebate outperforms strong single-model cascades and standalone multi-agent systems by up to 26.75 percent. An online threshold optimizer proves essential, boosting accuracy by 20.98 to 52.33 percent relative improvement over fixed policies and enabling elastic adaptation to real-world distributions.
arXiv cs.AI
GAM: Hierarchical Graph-based Agentic Memory for LLM Agents
To sustain coherent long-term interactions, Large Language Model (LLM) agents must navigate the tension between acquiring new information and retaining prior knowledge. Current unified stream-based memory systems facilitate context updates but remain vulnerable to interference from transient noise. Conversely, discrete structured memory architectures provide robust knowledge retention but often struggle to adapt to evolving narratives. To address this, we propose GAM, a hierarchical Graph-based Agentic Memory framework that explicitly decouples memory encoding from consolidation to effectively resolve the conflict between rapid context perception and stable knowledge retention. By isolating ongoing dialogue in an event progression graph and integrating it into a topic associative network only upon semantic shifts, our approach minimizes interference while preserving long-term consistency. Additionally, we introduce a graph-guided, multi-factor retrieval strategy to enhance context precision. Experiments on LoCoMo and LongDialQA indicate that our method consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in both reasoning accuracy and efficiency.
arXiv cs.AI
Local-Splitter: A Measurement Study of Seven Tactics for Reducing Cloud LLM Token Usage on Coding-Agent Workloads
We present a systematic measurement study of seven tactics for reducing cloud LLM token usage when a small local model can act as a triage layer in front of a frontier cloud model. The tactics are: (1) local routing, (2) prompt compression, (3) semantic caching, (4) local drafting with cloud review, (5) minimal-diff edits, (6) structured intent extraction, and (7) batching with vendor prompt caching. We implement all seven in an open-source shim that speaks both MCP and the OpenAI-compatible HTTP surface, supporting any local model via Ollama and any cloud model via an OpenAI-compatible endpoint. We evaluate each tactic individually, in pairs, and in a greedy-additive subset across four coding-agent workload classes (edit-heavy, explanation-heavy, general chat, RAG-heavy). We measure tokens saved, dollar cost, latency, and routing accuracy. Our headline finding is that T1 (local routing) combined with T2 (prompt compression) achieves 45-79% cloud token savings on edit-heavy and explanation-heavy workloads, while on RAG-heavy workloads the full tactic set including T4 (draft-review) achieves 51% savings. We observe that the optimal tactic subset is workload-dependent, which we believe is the most actionable finding for practitioners deploying coding agents today.
arXiv cs.AI
Towards grounded autonomous research: an end-to-end LLM mini research loop on published computational physics
Recent autonomous LLM agents have demonstrated end-to-end automation of machine-learning research. Real-world physical science is intrinsically harder, requiring deep reasoning bounded by physical truth and, because real systems are too complex to study in isolation, almost always built on existing literature. We focus on the smallest meaningful unit of such research, a mini research loop in which an agent reads a paper, reproduces it, critiques it, and extends it. We test this loop in two complementary regimes: scale and depth. At scale, across 111 open-access computational physics papers, an agent autonomously runs the read-plan-compute-compare loop and, without being asked to critique, raises substantive concerns on ~42% of papers - 97.7% of which require execution to surface. In depth, for one Nature Communications paper on multiscale simulation of a 2D-material MOSFET, the agent runs new calculations missing from the original and produces, unsupervised, a publishable Comment -- composed, figured, typeset, and PDF-iterated -- that revises the paper's headline conclusion.